Your browser is no longer supported. For the best experience of this website, please upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have s disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable s in your browser

M&S chief: 'There will be more store closures'

Marks & Spencer chief executive Steve Rowe has said “more than 100 stores” will close as the retailer forges ahead with its turnaround plan.

M&S is in “the heart” of the first phase of its most recent three-to-five year turnaround programme, part of which involved the closure of 100 unprofitable UK stores. Of those, 29 have shut so far, but today Rowe said there will be further closures as M&S “catches up” with competitors and implements an approach of “constant churn” towards its store portfolio.

“It will be more than 100 stores,” said Rowe. “We need 100 store closures to get us into the right shape to reach our goal of one-third of sales coming from online, but we won’t stop the programme.

“We need to continue the churn consistently to make sure we are in the right locations, and to make sure our stores are fit for the future and have inspirational environments. We need to catch up with other retailers [who do the same].

“We are dealing with a legacy estate of smaller, high street stores. We are working with landlords and councils. We need to reduce our rents with landlords. The days of rents only going up are gone. We need to get the right price.”

Rowe stressed that the strategy was not to cut jobs, and of the stores closed so far, 83% of colleagues had been redeployed.

In the six months to 29 September group revenue fell 3.1% on 2017 to £4.9bn. Profit before tax and adjusting items was up 2% to £223.5m.

Clothing and home sales continued to drop, and were down 2.7% on 2017 following the store closures.

Like-for-like sales of clothing and home were down 1.1%.

Rowe told Drapers he hoped the clothing and home division would return to growth next year: “We are pleased with our progress and our performance in key areas like lingerie, footwear, schoolwear, but there have been a few misses,” he admitted.

During the half-year the prices of 1,000 clothing lines were reduced and M&S said customers were responding positively to the changes. In womenswear 19% of sales now come from the lowest-price “good” bracket, up from 7% in 2015/16.

The retailer said it wanted less complexity in its collections and more newness throughout the season. It will reassess its clothing sub-brands and reduce the number of styles.

“We have too many lines and we’re not buying deeply enough. There will be a further reduction in options in spring next year,” said Rowe. “We need to make sure they reflect our younger customers and contemporary handwriting.”

M&S is also adjusting its sizing by introducing a slimmer fit for younger customers, and will change its sizing ratios to improve availability of smaller sizes.

Although the retailer wants to attract younger, family-orientated consumers, chairman Archie Norman stressed it would not alienate its core, more mature customer base: “We have older shoppers that may be 55 but they want to look 35. They want good, quality products. We are number one for back to school – those kids have mums and they are shopping with us. We need to broaden our appeal to become more stylish and better value. We are not walking away from any one customer group.”

M&S is also focusing on improving availability and has increased capacity at its distribution centre at Castle Donington in the Midlands by a third since this time last year.

“Last year a lot of our lines sold out,” said Rowe. “Our availability is improving, but we’re still in a position where we are buying too broad and too shallow, and we haven’t optimised our sales. We’re looking at our supply chain end to end, and are hoping to see improvements next year.”

Rowe said M&S had made some progress with improving its digital offer, and more than 20% of clothing and home sales now take place online: “We have improved our photography and extended our cut-off deadline for next-day delivery from 8pm to 10pm.

“Our product download time improved by one second, but we are nowhere near best in class. There is lots more to do to improve delivery options and increase conversion and speed.”

 

Readers' comments (4)

  • Why it has taken M&S so long to realise that it has to shrink its physical presence is anyones guess, but it is already too late?

    The stores are generally dated, cluttered with an average age of consumer which is worryingly high. The latter will make changing their age demographic even harder, so it will be interesting to see if they can get anywhere near their intended aims.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bigger issue is that food is now declining. That was the cash cow. Amazon whole foods power play to come next. Digital advancement elsewhere in fashion to double down the despair.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • darren hoggett

    Rowe mentions 'value'. That can mean a number of things, but often it means cheaper items. If this is the case, then it would be a huge mistake.

    People used to shop at M&S because it was quality would always come first. Customers were prepared to pay more for that, because the items would last.

    However since the 2000's, the brand seemed too concerned about what everybody else was doing and started to be too price conscious. With that, the quality wasn't what should have been. The main reason why people went to M&S in the first place was being lost in my view.

    M&S must significantly premium-ise to the extent that it should become the store that everybody wants to buy from, even if not everyone can afford it. Make a much smaller portfolio of stores the absolute best in the business that would be the envy of all the competition and the first port of call for all overseas visitors.

    It would be a bold and brave move as the current communications from M&S do not look like things will change in any significant degree, so time for a completely new vision while the opportunity is there.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Wandering around M&S the other day, I felt like Mr Benn going into a Parallel Universe. It soon became clear that they don't know how to retail properly. A bold statement you may say, but you have to get the basics right and they haven't got a clue.

    For example, they have Cashmere Jumpers at £90.00 a pop. Nothing wrong with that. However they are Raglan sleeve, therefore they should displayed on a table. Not at M&S! They are on hangers, so the shoulders are already past their best and once tried on, you will see the lump of where the hangers should not have been. So the consumer will then want another one, but will face the same problem, so will want their money back.

    It's not just retail, it's M&S retail and one that should not be copied.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

https://tokyozakka.com.ua